Not tonight, dear . . . in fact, not ever
Feminism gave women control of their sex lives, but has it gone too far? Author and sex expert Dr Pam Spurr argues that many women are risking their relationships by saying no
Emily, 37, is a successful solicitor with a husband and a two-year-old son. To her friends, she doubtless lives a charmed existence. But recently she sat across from me in a life coaching session. She was very distressed. Having just discovered that her husband of five years had had an affair, she felt that her world had disintegrated. Shed been a good partner, hadnt she? She was caring and hardworking, wasnt she?
Closer examination of their relationship revealed that Emily hadnt had sex with her husband for many months. When I pushed Emily gently on this she was incredibly defensive. It was her view that she was too busy with her career and raising their son to give any thought or time to sex.
Over the past two decades I have worked as a psychologist, life coach and sex expert, and I have found that Emilys attitude is all too common. And such views dont bode well for the success of relationships. With increasing frequency, women in their twenties, thirties and forties take a pragmatic, postfeminist view that sex is something over which they have no need to negotiate. In the bedroom, there is no compromise. If a man has a higher sex drive than a woman, then he can sort himself out. If he wants to try something new and she cant be bothered, tough luck to him.
Eventually, Emily and her husband repaired their relationship which meant learning how to confront their differences, including sexual ones.
Olivia, a 39-year-old investment consultant, was less fortunate. She had wanted to make certain financial investments that her husband was against. Issues about their finances spread bad feeling into all other areas of their life and, like a stone dropped in water, the ripples from their acrimonious discussions reached far and wide.
When Olivia found that the stress of their differences diminished her sex drive, she felt completely justified in suggesting separate bedrooms. As she recounted to me with bitter regret, after their divorce sex had been the last thing on her mind. Her biggest mistake was not considering what was on his mind.
Having researched my new book, as well as talked to thousands of men and women over the years, I now firmly believe that too many women see the sexual side of their lives as something to be claimed completely and utterly as their own. Thats fine for single women flexing their sexual muscles.
But once they settle into a relationship, many will continue to do so. This doesnt make sense to me at all and unfortunately Im privy to the heartbreak and distress that goes along with this view.
Like it or not, a sexless life is at the root of much heartache and many affairs and/or relationship break-ups. And although lack of sex can often be a symptom of other problems that lead a relationship to break down, it can also be the cause.
At the risk of being called old-fashioned (though I dont think that old-fashioned should always have negative connotations) and antifeminist, Id go so far as to say that for both partners sex could be considered a duty, if it is something that one partner knows would make the other happy.
Does he really want to go up on the roof to repair a leak on a Sunday afternoon?
Does she really want to take out the rubbish in the pouring rain? No, but partners in relationships do such things because they know that it makes the other happy. Sex should be seen in the same light.
I am not advocating submission. I oppose the idea that anyone should feel pressured into sex; I understand that the sexualisation of society often puts unnatural expectations on both women and men. I am merely pointing out that sex, as with other parts of a relationship, needs constant care and compromise. Why should the sexual area of a relationship be ringed by an emotional fence that makes it a no-go zone for discussion, while other areas are discussed openly, argued over and resolved?
Sometimes where sex has waned, both parties initially had different physical needs that were not discussed openly at the time. I have spoken to a fair few thirty-something women who settle down with a decent chap knowing that hell make a good father. On producing babies, though, many such men find themselves left out in the cold when they still desire the sexual warmth that they initially enjoyed. Such complete sexual pragmatism seems fair to these women, but what about the men? To them, sexually, men dont seem to matter much once they have served their purpose.
Sometimes both partners feel that sex does not rank highly on their list of priorities. Thats fine. Theres no negotiation necessary when youre both in agreement. But many women simply feel that their lives are too stressful, or that they are dealing with other relationship issues, and they dont want to raise sex as yet another issue with which to contend.
That is a very dangerous place to be if the man doesnt feel the same way. You may find, as Emily did, that he will seek sexual satisfaction without you. I certainly dont justify infidelity but I can often understand why it happens. In contrast, when a womans sexual needs are denied, Heaven help the man responsible.
Jessica, 36, a political lobbyist, told me that she felt strongly that she and her husband were too young to give up enjoying sexual pleasure. It caused her much pain that he put long hours at work above consideration for their sex life. Tellingly, the reaction from many of her friends was How dare he?
That goes to the heart of this issue. As women, we have come to expect that we can control our sex lives completely but we get angry when a man wants to do so.
Some may argue that sex is such an intimate and personal set of behaviours and beliefs that lack of compromise is justified. I would argue quite the opposite. It is because of its personal nature that sex should be explored between a couple. And by exploring their differences, and reconciling them, a couples attachment to, and love for, each other is often heightened.
In other cases I have found an even more disturbing attitude: that its fine to use occasional sex in a cold-hearted and calculated way as a favour or bartering tool for jobs well done by the man.
Amanda, a 38-year-old photographer, bartered sexual favours with her live-in partner when he did a particularly difficult piece of DIY or nasty bit of graft, such as unplugging drains. Using sex as a bargaining chip demeans both partners.
The solution is to take a holistic approach to a relationship and understand that every part of it careers, finances, family issues, sex needs nurturing and understanding. Its the only I count sexual attitudes that are killing off much sexual intimacy.
Never be bullied into sexual activity that turns you off or be pressured into sex that doesnt satisfy you. But always be prepared to discuss your feelings and desires and listen to his. Hopefully, that will improve your sex life and help to strengthen your relationship in other ways, too.
Jessica, 36, a political lobbyist, told me that she felt strongly that she and her husband were too young to give up enjoying sexual pleasure. It caused her much pain that he put long hours at work above consideration for their sex life. Tellingly, the reaction from many of her friends was How dare he?
That goes to the heart of this issue. As women, we have come to expect that we can control our sex lives completely but we get angry when a man wants to do so.
Actually, most women in this situation feel hurt and embarrassed, and are unlikely to discuss it openly, believing they are the only ones going through it. After all, the stereotype is that men are supposed to be hot and ready for sex all the time, and if a woman's husband loses interest in sex, she is likely to wonder if there is something wrong with her and be ashamed that she couldn't maintain his interest. Also, the same stereotype inhibits men in this situation from discussing it at all, because of shame that he is not interested like he's supposed to be.
Blaming feminism is a cop-out. Having greater agency neither causes a lack of sexual desire, nor does it reinforce it. It would be more honest to say that the women that Spurr is dealing with have control issues, and that would be true whether or not the women's movement had ever taken place. Remember: the image of the frigid wife existed long before the concept of feminism came into being. The only difference now is that women may feel more comfortable speaking openly about a lack of desire.
(http://livejournal.com/users/ultimategirl)